Believe it or not, I never knew that "Mums" stood for
"Chrysanthemums" but I at least knew that they were flowers. But that
is beside the point.
This story was indeed one that I will remember because I
feel that I understood it better than most. The married woman with no children
liked to work in her garden, and she seemed content with this. But, throughout
the story it seemed that she simply longed to be viewed as an equal by her
husband, as well as everyone else. The setting is described to be rather desolate
and isolated from society, as well as enclosed with fog. I presume that this
description was foreshadowing her feelings towards her life. She felt entrapped
by the way she lived her life (or lack thereof). I viewed her responsibilities
as low level and very routine. Anyone would get tired of gardening every day
and domestic chores, right? Not to mention, she craved any kind of praise or recognition
for her existence but never received any. The man who manipulated her into
paying for his service did so by playing with her emotions (Just like every man). After convincing
her that he wanted her flowers for a good purpose, he almost immediately threw them out onto the
dirt road. Sadly, these Chrysanthemums were the only thing that she had passion
and love for; Therefore, when she saw her prized possessions thrown onto the road she took this to heart and this proved her hypothesis
that men are animals. At the end, this is why she preceded to ask her husband
about the fights in town that men would engage in and ended up crying
secretively. I believe that she realized that she was nothing like them and
felt that her battle for equality was futile, after all.